Horn profiles
Flare comparison
Five flare laws drawn between the same throat and mouth, with length, volume and throat resistance side by side.
Loading sheet…
Horn profiles
Five flare laws drawn between the same throat and mouth, with length, volume and throat resistance side by side.
Loading sheet…
Plane-wave model with a baffled-piston mouth, normalised to ρc/St. Higher and earlier is better loading; less ripple is a smoother hand-over at the mouth.
| Flare | Length | Air volume | vs exp. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exponential | 59.2 cm | 20.2 L | 0 % |
| Hypex T = 0.6 | 65.2 cm | 20.6 L | 10 % |
| Tractrix | 54.4 cm | 16.5 L | -8 % |
| Spherical wave | 55.3 cm | 17.2 L | -7 % |
| Conical, same length | 59.2 cm | 33.4 L | 0 % |
This sheet draws five flare laws between the same throat and the same mouth, all designed for the same cut-off . The cone has no cut-off of its own, so it is given the length of the exponential horn for a fair comparison of loading per unit of depth.
The impedance curves come from one-dimensional (Webster) horn theory, which assumes the wave-front area equals the cross-section. That is accurate for slowly flaring horns and optimistic for the last part of a tractrix or spherical-wave flare, where the real wave-front is strongly curved. Directivity, which often decides the choice in practice, is not shown here at all.