Driver matching
Driver to throat match
Keele’s Thiele/Small method: matched throat area, compression ratio, efficiency and the four band-edge corners.
Loading sheet…
Driver matching
Keele’s Thiele/Small method: matched throat area, compression ratio, efficiency and the four band-edge corners.
Loading sheet…
The horn is taken as a pure resistance ρc/St at all frequencies, radiating into half space. Its own cut-off should sit at or below fLC.
D. B. Keele showed in 1977 that the pass-band of a horn-loaded driver can be predicted from its Thiele/Small parameters alone, provided the horn behaves as a pure resistance above its cut-off. This sheet follows that model: it finds the throat area that matches the driver, then the four corner frequencies that bound the usable band.
Seen from the cone, the motor and the horn each look like a mechanical resistance:
The driver delivers most power for a given voltage when the two are equal. Solving for the throat area, and rewriting in Thiele/Small terms:
A smaller throat (higher compression ratio) widens the band and lowers efficiency; a larger one does the opposite. Strong motors with low call for small throats, which is why compression drivers have them.
With the matched throat and negligible suspension loss, Keele's corner frequencies are
For any other throat the calculator uses the exact expressions behind those shortcuts, with total mechanical resistance and the combined compliance of suspension and rear chamber:
At the matched throat this approaches 50 %, the theoretical limit for maximum power transfer. Real horns land well below it once mouth reflections, wall losses and the horn's own cut-off are included; use the system response sheet for that.